This exercise is a bit like if someone asked you your opinion on what happened to him. After the lectures, that the concrete!
You're in the shoes of a lawyer, faced with a case you need clarification.
There are 3 parts:
Introduction
1 - the facts: It summarizes the maximum removing the superfluous, but keeping all that could be important ...
2 - The characterization of the facts: we need to shape the facts, give them a legal sense, with a contract for example ...
3 - The legal question: As for the comment it follows from the finding of facts and statement of the problem. She also is introduced by "whether it is ..."
4 - The different possible solutions principe.Vous here set out the questions that must be asked to find the solution to the dispute. It ends up with some questions (if they were already asked, are found here, unless you make an introduction shorter for each question).
5 - Announcement plan.Ici no title, it anonce just thinking that we will follow, as clearly as possible.
Development
You must make as many parts as there are problems and subdivide the problem if there is one.
It is not necessary to be careful about the balance between the parties: here is flexible.
You must appreciate the facts, identifying legal, give your opinions and solutions you can provide.
Conclusion
It is mandatory and important.
should summarize the solutions you have arrived starting with a sentence like: "It appears that ultimately ...". If you wish, but especially an opening made no prediction on what might happen in the future!
0 comments:
Post a Comment