this case study relates to contract law and more specifically to the breach of contract.
FACTS: The sucursalle of Mr. LOSEILLE endomagée was badly he could not deliver his client PULLMAILLE society, the latter has the dc source also undergoing a significant additional cost and it wants the company of Mr. LOSEILLE more plastic supports. It would unilaterally withdraw
its contract with more plastic.
Problematic indeed : Mr. LOSEILLE How could he avoid PULLMAILLE indemnify the company?
How can he maintain the contract between his company PULLMAILLE?
Article 1147: The debtor is condemned, if any payment of damages or by reason of breach of contract either on account of delay in execution, whenever it does not justify that failure comes from an external cause that can not be imputed, even though there was no bad faith on his part.
Article 1184: The conditions subsequent is always implied in contracts synalagmatique for the case that one party will satisfy both point to his involvement in this case the contract is not automatically canceled. the party to whom the undertaking has not been executed, a choice or force the other to perform the agreement when possible, or to request termination with damages. the resolution must be made to the court and may grant the defendant a period depending on circumstances.
law Problem: The cause that led to the breach of contract is it has a foreign RESPONSIBILITIES contract? MORE PLASTIC
The company is it in the circumstances foreseen in article 1184 PULLMAILLE end that demand resolution of unilateral contract?
0 comments:
Post a Comment